Grade 5 Titanium, D2 Steel, Smaller Than An AirPod: The Natanto Folding Knife Has Nothing Left to Prove

Posted on by

Tanto blades were originally developed for armor penetration, ground with a reinforced tip geometry that could punch through hardened surfaces where a conventional drop point would snap or deflect. That heritage tends to disappear when the profile gets shrunk to keychain scale, mostly because the execution rarely holds up at that size. The geometry promises precision and the material delivers something fragile. TiMav’s Natanto takes the tanto format at its word, pairing the profile with a D2 tool steel blade that carries a 2.7mm spine, the same thickness found on full-size production folders, and a 15-degree V-grind on each side that keeps cutting resistance genuinely low.

The whole knife closes to 39.7mm and weighs 10.8g, which makes the spec list that follows feel like it was lifted from a larger product. The Grade 5 titanium frame is CNC-milled from a solid billet, no welds, no seams, no structural compromise. Dual brass washers carry the pivot with smooth, even resistance rather than the spring-loaded snap of ball bearings. A frame lock clicks into place at full extension and stays there until deliberately released. The 4.5mm keychain aperture threads onto standard rings, bag pulls, and headphone cases without forcing, and two finish options, sandblasted titanium and PVD black, round out a package that ships worldwide with no additional charge.

Designer: TiMav EDC Design Team

Click Here to Buy Now: $32 $55 (42% off). Hurry, only a few left!

D2 tool steel is a fitting choice for a knife this small because edge retention matters more when the blade gives you very little room to waste motion. Natanto’s modified tanto shape concentrates that usefulness into the tip, giving it the kind of precise entry that helps with tape seams, plastic blister packs, zip ties, and other annoying materials that usually punish tiny blades first. The 15-degree V-grind on each side keeps the knife slicing cleanly instead of wedging its way through a cut, and the 2.7mm spine adds the kind of stiffness that makes the blade feel planted rather than flimsy. For a micro folder, that thickness changes the experience immediately. You press down and the blade holds its line.

Closed, the knife is only 39.7mm long, or 1.56 inches, and when opened it stretches to 63.3mm, about 2.49 inches. It weighs 10.8 grams, roughly 0.38 ounces, which puts it firmly in the category of tools you can forget you are carrying until the exact moment you need them. That is really the whole appeal of the Natanto. It is sized for the kind of cutting jobs that appear constantly and disappear just as fast, opening deliveries, trimming loose threads, cutting tags, slicing tape, nicking into sealed bags, or cutting zip ties without fumbling for scissors. TiMav clearly designed it for people who want a real blade on hand without committing to a full-size folder in their pocket.

That sense of seriousness carries into the frame too. The handle is made from Grade 5 titanium and CNC-milled from solid stock rather than assembled from multiple cheap parts. At the same strength, titanium comes in far lighter than steel, which is exactly why it makes sense on a keychain knife where every gram counts. The frame has milled finger channels that create actual indexing points for your grip, a small detail that matters more here than it would on a larger knife. With a tiny form factor, control is everything. A slippery handle turns every cut into guesswork, while a shaped frame lets your fingers settle into place quickly and keeps the knife from shifting mid-cut. The handle measures 13.7mm wide and 7mm thick, enough to feel stable in hand without becoming a bulky object hanging off your keys.

Opening the blade looks refreshingly free of gimmicks. Natanto uses dual thumb studs placed for a natural pinch motion, so you are not digging at a nail nick or trying to pry the blade loose with a fingertip. The action rides on dual brass washers, which gives the movement a measured, deliberate feel rather than a loose, snappy flick. That suits a knife this size much better. Once open, the frame lock engages with a distinct click and holds the blade securely in place. TiMav also claims the blade floats within the titanium frame when closed, avoiding internal contact and wear over time, which should help preserve the action instead of letting it get sloppy with repeated use.

The Natanto closes to 39.7mm, making it shorter than a standard house key, and weighs 10.8 grams, lighter than half an AA battery. That size makes it smaller than the average house-key, earning a place on your keychain. The 4.5mm keychain aperture accommodates most keyrings, carabiner clips, and bag pulls without forcing or scraping. This is a knife for people who want a blade available without the commitment of pocket carry. It sits on your keys, in your EDC pouch, or clipped to a belt loop, and it handles the micro-tasks that tend to accumulate throughout a day. Opening mail. Cutting tags off new purchases. Stripping wire insulation. Breaking down a shipping box. Tasks that take seconds with the right tool and minutes without one. Just remember to take it off your keys when traveling by flights, since the knife isn’t airline-compliant.

Two finish options are available: sandblasted titanium, which carries a raw, matte surface, and PVD black, which adds a stealth coating over the titanium frame. Both finishes share the same construction, materials, and engineering. The Natanto is currently available for $32 USD, with free worldwide shipping included.

Click Here to Buy Now: $32 $55 (42% off). Hurry, only a few left!

The post Grade 5 Titanium, D2 Steel, Smaller Than An AirPod: The Natanto Folding Knife Has Nothing Left to Prove first appeared on Yanko Design.

Lymow One Plus Review: The Tank Got an Engineering Degree

Posted on by

PROS:


  • LiFePO4 battery rated 2,000+ cycles outlasts all lithium-ion competitors

  • Heated cameras eliminate morning fog and dew navigation issues

  • 1,785W motor handles thick, wet, overgrown grass without bogging

  • Cyclone Airflow deck lifts flattened grass for a cleaner cut

  • Self-cleaning tracks and redesigned hub motors reduce long-term maintenance

CONS:


  • Blades, batteries, and chargers not cross-compatible with Gen 1

  • Pre-order starts at $2,699, $300 more than the Gen 1 launch price

RATINGS:

AESTHETICS
ERGONOMICS
PERFORMANCE
SUSTAINABILITY / REPAIRABILITY
VALUE FOR MONEY

EDITOR'S QUOTE:

The Lymow One Plus is the robot mower that finally makes traditional mowing obsolete.

When I reviewed the original Lymow One last August, I called it nimble, powerful, and reliable. It was the first robot mower I had tested that did not just shave my lawn with tiny razor discs. It actually mowed. Real rotary blades, tank treads, and the kind of cutting power that could handle thick St. Augustine grass without flinching. On my property, with 32 massive oak trees creating GPS dead zones and physical obstacle courses that make other robot mowers throw in the towel, the Lymow One earned its spot.

But first-gen hardware always comes with rough edges. The bottom-mounted charging contacts turned into mud magnets. The cameras fogged up during early morning dew. If you cranked the speed to maximum in a treed section, this thing would literally try to climb the trunk. I learned that lesson the hard way. It is those exact war stories that made the mapping and setup process for this new One Plus the very first thing I scrutinized. I began by mapping my 6,777 square foot property via the app, which serves as the foundation for the performance results that follow.

Designer: Lymow

Click Here to Buy Now: $2699 $2999 ($300 off). Hurry, deal ends in 48-hours!

Lymow collected feedback from the entire first production run and, instead of shipping a minor refresh, completely re-engineered the machine for its CES 2026 debut. The result is the Lymow One Plus: same tank-track DNA, same dual rotary blade philosophy, but with targeted fixes for every friction point Gen 1 owners identified. I have been running the One Plus on the same property, same 32 oaks, same slopes, and same thick grass, for several weeks now. This is not a fresh review. It is a direct continuation from someone who knows exactly where the Gen 1 fell short.

How I’m Testing the Lymow One Plus

To give this mower a proper workout, I started with the wire-free setup and mapping process. Since this system does not require a perimeter wire, the initial installation is relatively straightforward. I began by driving the mower like a remote-control car to define the boundaries of my 6,777 square foot property, which served as the foundation for the weeks of testing that followed. My test property in central Texas features 32 mature oak trees that create GPS dead zones across roughly half the yard and exposed root systems that have defeated every wheeled robot mower I have tested.

Design/Ergonomics

The transition from a traditional mower to a robot requires a shift in how you think about your yard. As I noted in my original Lymow One review, the setup is the most critical part of the user journey. For this review, I mapped my 6,777 square foot property entirely via the app.

LySee 2.0: The Cameras Can Finally See in the Morning

My property is the worst-case scenario for robot mower navigation. Thirty-two mature oaks with canopies thick enough to block satellite signals across half the yard. The original Lymow One’s RTK-VSLAM hybrid handled this better than any GPS-only mower I had tested, seamlessly handing off between satellite positioning in the open sections and visual navigation under the canopy. The transition was nearly invisible.

The weak spot was early morning. Texas humidity and morning dew would fog the stereo cameras during those pre-dawn sessions, and the visual system would degrade until the lenses warmed up. I noticed occasional “drift” under the heavy canopy during early runs that corrected itself once the sun burned off the moisture.

The One Plus addresses this directly with integrated heating elements in the camera housings. The lenses maintain a temperature above the dew point. This prevents condensation from forming in the first place. During my testing, the cameras stayed clear even in high humidity conditions.

The obstacle avoidance system has undergone extensive training to improve its real-world performance. Instead of just identifying objects, the mower now uses a combination of AI vision and ultrasonic sensors to determine how to handle obstacles. For smaller items like garden hoses or sprinkler heads, the AI recognizes the object and steers clear. For more complex terrain challenges like large oak roots or uneven ground, the ultrasonic sensors provide precision distance data that allows the mower to navigate the crossing safely without getting stuck. While the cameras identify everything from yard clutter to pets, it is important to note that all image processing happens locally on the mower. No video data is sent to the cloud, providing a layer of privacy for your home.

Interactive Status Display

The One Plus features a built-in LCD screen that provides real-time status updates directly on the machine. By separating this display from the LySee camera system, Lymow has made it easier to check battery levels, connection status, and current operation modes at a glance without needing to pull out your phone.

Heated cameras are not something you can isolate in a single controlled test. Fog, dew, and humidity vary day to day, and the real proof shows up over weeks of early morning sessions, not one dramatic before-and-after. I will be updating this section as I accumulate more pre-dawn runs throughout the spring, comparing the One Plus’s FPV clarity and navigation confidence to what I experienced with the Gen 1 under similar conditions. Obstacle avoidance around oak roots, garden hoses, and yard clutter will get the same ongoing treatment. Check back for updates as testing continues.

Performance

LyCut 2.0: The Blades Got Meaner, the Deck Got Smarter

The original Lymow One ran a 1,200W peak motor that I praised for tackling thick St. Augustine at my preferred 3,000 RPM “slow and steady” setting. At that speed, the blades cut clean and the yard looked professional. Crank it to 6,000 RPM for quick touch-ups and the power was there when I needed it.

The One Plus bumps peak power to 1,785W. That is a 50% increase, and the practical difference shows up in the worst-case scenarios: dense spring growth that has not been cut in two weeks, wet grass that clumps and resists cutting, or the thick patches near the base of my oaks where grass grows wild between root systems. The Gen 1 could handle most of this. The Gen 2 should handle all of it without the blade speed dropping under load.

But the bigger story is the new Cyclone Airflow system in the LyCut 2.0 deck. The original cutting deck was a standard floating dual-rotary setup. It worked, but “laid-over” grass, which are blades bent flat by foot traffic, rain, or the mower’s own tracks, would sometimes pass under the blades uncut. You would see patches where the grass was creased but not trimmed.

The redesigned deck creates a vacuum effect that pulls flattened grass upright just before the SK5 steel blades make contact. It is the difference between cutting what is standing and cutting everything. The blades themselves remain the same SK5 tool steel with 50 HRC hardness, now backed by a floating cutting deck that adapts to terrain variations independently from the chassis. Cutting height stays adjustable from 1.2 to 4.0 inches, and the 16-inch width covers serious ground on each pass.

I ran my usual test: I walked a grid pattern across a section of thick St. Augustine to flatten it, then sent the One Plus through. The Gen 1 would leave visible creased patches where the grass had been pushed flat by foot traffic. You would see these sad little stripes where the blades passed right over without cutting. The One Plus left a noticeably cleaner finish on the same test. It is not perfect, because nothing short of a reel mower handles fully matted St. Augustine flawlessly, but the improvement is real. The worst laid-over patches that the Gen 1 would completely miss now get at least partially caught. You can see the airflow pulling blades upright before the cut happens if you watch closely from the side.

What Early Adopters Reported (and What I Actually Found)

Three issues surfaced consistently in early 2026 user feedback: pathfinding “world tours” where the mower takes massive detours between zones, tread scuffing on wet turf during multi-point turns, and an app refresh bug that requires force-closing to see updated battery percentages. I went looking for all three. None of them showed up.

The One Plus navigated between my front and back yards through the narrow side channels without any detours or wasted battery. This model introduces significantly expanded multi-zone capability, allowing you to manage and customize up to 80 or more distinct zones. This is a major plus for complex properties with isolated grass patches or different landscaping requirements. You can set specific schedules and cutting heights for each area individually, which gives you much more granular control than the previous generation.

Tread scuffing was not an issue either. I ran multi-point turns on wet St. Augustine after morning rain, which is the exact scenario early adopters flagged, and saw no tearing or lasting marks. The tracks compress the grass temporarily, but it bounces back within a few hours. On established turf, this is a non-issue.

The app refresh bug is the only one I cannot fully rule out yet. I have not encountered it personally, but I also have not been obsessively checking battery percentages mid-session. I will keep an eye on it, though so far the app has shown accurate, real-time status every time I have opened it.

Sustainability

Self-Cleaning Tracks and Motors Built for the Long Haul

The original Lymow One’s tank treads were its signature feature and they performed exactly as advertised on slopes, roots, and uneven ground. However, over months of daily use, grass clippings and small gravel could accumulate inside the wheel wells. While not catastrophic, this was a maintenance item that added up and was reported by Gen 1 owners as a source of mechanical strain on the hub motors.

The One Plus addresses these concerns with self-cleaning side brushes that sweep debris out of the wheel wells during operation and a detachable track cover that allows for deeper cleaning without tools. Most importantly, Lymow completely redesigned the drivetrain with more robust motors. These improved hub motors feature 200% higher rigidity, meaning they are built to handle the constant stress of climbing 45-degree slopes without the mechanical fatigue that could shorten the lifespan of the machine. In my testing on steep embankments, the drive system felt noticeably more stable and sounded smoother under load.

The Efficiency of the 5A and 10A Fast Chargers

While the 5A charger serves as a more affordable entry point, covering approximately 1.1 acres per day, the high-performance 10A fast charger is the standard for those with larger properties. The 10A unit refills the LiFePO4 battery (15,000 mAh) from 10% to 90% in about 90 minutes. This allows for up to three mowing cycles per day, covering a total of 1.73 acres. Providing both options gives users the flexibility to choose the setup that best fits their yard size and budget.

The LiFePO4 chemistry remains the same, which is the right call. Standard lithium-ion batteries start losing meaningful capacity after two to three years of daily cycling. LiFePO4 at 2,000+ cycles means the battery should outlast the useful life of the machine. At $2,899, knowing you will not face a $500 battery replacement in year three is a real cost of ownership advantage.

The operating temperature range is also worth noting. It allows for 1 degree F to 134 degrees F for discharge and 37 degrees F to 134 degrees F for charging. That covers everything from an early spring morning to a Texas August afternoon without battery management concerns.

Value/Verdict

Is the One Plus Worth It

At a starting pre-order price of $2,699 for the 5A version, which sits $300 above the Gen 1’s launch price, or $2,899 for the 10A model, the Lymow One Plus brings substantial hardware upgrades to the table. That delta buys you the top-mounted charging system that eliminates the single most annoying maintenance task, a 50% power bump that shows up in thick spring growth, heated cameras for reliable early morning navigation, self-cleaning tracks, improved hub motors, and access to a professional-grade 10A fast charger. For anyone upgrading from the Gen 1, Lymow’s exclusive program offering up to 40% off or a trade-in makes the math straightforward. The charging fix and fast charger alone would justify it.

Compared to the competition, the value equation holds up. The Navimow X450 retails for $2,999 and is an AWD powerhouse with a class-leading 17-inch cutting deck. While its 84 percent slope rating is impressive for a wheeled machine, it cannot match the raw mechanical grip of the Lymow tracks on loose soil or 100 percent inclines. It also relies on standard lithium-ion batteries. This means you will likely see capacity degradation years before the Lymow battery shows its age.

The ECOVACS GOAT A3000 is the more budget-friendly pick at $2,099 to $2,499, but you sacrifice significant cutting width and the ability to handle anything beyond a standard suburban slope. Even the Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD, which features a similar tri-fusion navigation system, still uses wheels and standard lithium-ion chemistry. By choosing the One Plus, you are getting nearly triple the battery cycle life because of the LiFePO4 cells. While other packs might require a replacement after five or six years of use, this battery is designed to outlive the mower itself.

The LiFePO4 battery is the hidden value play that most spec comparisons miss. At 2,000+ cycles, you are looking at five to seven years of daily use before meaningful capacity loss. Every competitor in this price range uses lithium-ion chemistry rated for 500 to 800 cycles. Over a five-year ownership window, the Lymow saves you a $400 to $600 battery replacement that the others will eventually require. Factor that into the purchase price and the One Plus is actually the cheapest option to own long-term for properties that need tracked, heavy-duty mowing.

Pricing, Availability, and the Upgrade Program

The Lymow One Plus is available for pre-order at $2,699 for the 5A model and $2,899 for the 10A model, representing a $300 discount off the eventual retail prices. The 5A model covers 1.1 acres per day, and the 10A model covers 1.73 acres per day with faster charging.

US shipping begins April 20 for both versions. Canadian shipping starts April 15 for the 5A and May 18 for the 10A. The box includes the mower, charging station with adapter and 10m extension cable, RTK reference station with antenna and mounting hardware, and documentation.

For existing Lymow One owners, the company is running an exclusive upgrade program with up to 40% off or a trade-in option for the One Plus. One important note for Gen 1 owners planning to upgrade: blades, batteries, and other accessories are not interchangeable between the two models. The One Plus uses redesigned components throughout, so do not count on carrying over spare parts from your original machine.

The Verdict

The Lymow One Plus is what the original should have been. That is not a knock on the Gen 1, which I still think was a genuinely impressive first attempt at a tracked rotary robot mower. But the Plus fixes the things that made daily ownership frustrating: the charging contacts that required constant maintenance, the cameras that could not see through morning fog, and the previous charging limitations. Every major pain point I identified in my original review got a direct, engineered solution.

I will continue updating the heated camera section as spring testing progresses. But the core mowing experience, the cut quality, the terrain capability, and the autonomous reliability are the best I have tested in this category.

FAQ

What changed from the original Lymow One to the One Plus?

The biggest changes are the top-mounted charging contacts (moved from the bottom), 50% more peak cutting power (1,200W to 1,785W), and the Cyclone Airflow cutting deck. Hardware reliability has also been a major focus, with the addition of heated camera housings for all-weather navigation, a self-cleaning track system, and improved hub motors that have been completely redesigned for better long-term durability. Additionally, the One Plus offers a professional-grade 10A fast charger as a new configuration option.

Can the Lymow One Plus handle steep slopes?

It’s rated for 45 degrees (100% incline), the highest in the consumer market. The improved hub motors with 200% higher rigidity are designed to maintain traction without mechanical fatigue on sustained climbs.

Are Lymow One and One Plus accessories interchangeable?

The tracks are actually compatible between the two models, so you can keep those as spares. However, the blades, batteries, and chargers are not interchangeable because the One Plus uses upgraded components throughout the power system.

How long does the battery last?

The LiFePO4 battery provides approximately three hours of runtime per charge and is rated for 2,000+ cycles, significantly outlasting standard lithium-ion batteries.

Does it work without RTK signal?

It can mow small areas (0.025 to 0.037 acres) for up to 10 minutes without RTK, which covers brief signal drops but isn’t intended for sustained operation without the reference station.

Is there an upgrade program for Lymow One owners?

Yes. Lymow offers up to 40% off or a trade-in for original owners. Check the Lymow website for eligibility details and trade-in terms based on your unit’s serial number.

Click Here to Buy Now: $2699 $2999 ($300 off). Hurry, deal ends in 48-hours!

The post Lymow One Plus Review: The Tank Got an Engineering Degree first appeared on Yanko Design.

A Tiny Cabin in Hungary Is Quietly Rewriting Hospitality

Posted on by

The cabin that keeps showing up in my feed sits in the forested hills of northern Hungary, and once you see it, it is genuinely hard to unsee it. NestOff, designed by architect and interior designer Péter Kotek, is a prefabricated micro-retreat measuring just 20 square meters. On paper, that sounds like a significant compromise. In practice, it reads like a very calm, very confident argument that most of us have been taking up far too much space for far too long.

I have a complicated relationship with the micro-living conversation. It tends to swing between two exhausting extremes: the breathlessly optimistic content creator who insists that 18 square meters is “more than enough space for everything,” and the architecture critic who reminds us, correctly, that small spaces have historically been a symptom of poverty rather than a lifestyle choice. NestOff somehow sidesteps both camps entirely. It is not pretending to be a permanent home, and it is not selling you a fantasy of radical simplicity. It is a retreat. A considered, intelligently designed retreat, tucked between trees in Romhány in northern Hungary, and it wears that identity with genuine confidence.

Designer: Peter Kotek

Kotek worked with cabin fabricator Tajga-Depo to partially build the structure off-site, which meant better precision, reduced material waste, and a significantly shorter construction timeline on location. The cabin sits on ground screw foundations rather than poured concrete, and that decision matters more than it might initially seem. It means the structure can eventually be relocated without leaving a scar on the landscape beneath it. In an era when “eco-conscious design” has become something of a branding exercise, NestOff actually follows through on the promise. The land remains largely undisturbed. That is a genuinely rare thing to be able to say.

Inside, birch plywood covers the walls, ceilings, and built-in furniture, giving the space a warm and continuous quality that feels more like inhabiting a well-crafted object than occupying a room. The panoramic opening does exactly what a good view should do: it pulls the outside in without letting the outside overwhelm the interior. You are still in an enclosed, protected space, but the valley stretches out in front of you like a second room you never had to build or pay for. Kotek clearly understood that in a cabin this size, the view is not a bonus feature. It is structural.

The outdoor program is where NestOff gets particularly interesting. Two black timber vertical board cabins, the main unit and a separate sauna structure, are connected by a tiered larch deck. A hot tub sits alongside it. The sequence of spaces, moving from the interior out to the deck and then to the sauna and back, creates a rhythm of use that feels more deliberate than most full-sized hotels ever manage to achieve. Rest, bathing, sitting outside, going back in. It is not complicated. It is just very well thought out.

I keep returning to the question of what we actually need from a retreat. Not a vacation, which tends to involve airports, itineraries, and the performance of relaxation, but a genuine retreat. My honest answer is: not much. A bed. A meaningful view. Hot water. A reason to put the phone away. NestOff covers all of it within 20 square meters and a larch deck, and it does so without apology. That is not a failure of ambition. That is ambition pointed firmly in the right direction.

The micro-cabin category is crowded right now. Everyone from Scandinavian design studios to Silicon Valley-adjacent startups has something competing in that space. What separates NestOff from the noise is its complete absence of performance. It is not trying to impress you with a feature list or a manifesto. It is trying to give you a few nights in the Hungarian hills with nowhere else to be, and it is quietly very good at that one thing. Sometimes, that really is the whole point.

The post A Tiny Cabin in Hungary Is Quietly Rewriting Hospitality first appeared on Yanko Design.

15 years after ‘Video Games,’ Lana Del Rey has an actual video game song

Posted on by

The James Bond franchise has a long history of getting pop stars to record its theme songs (perhaps most memorably with Live and Let Die), and it looks like that tradition will now extend to video game adaptations about the fictional spy. IO Interactive has announced that Lana Del Rey co-wrote and performed the theme for 007 First Light, the developer's playable James Bond origin story.

"First Light" is written and performed by Lana Del Rey and composer David Arnold, and like the moody and abstract opening credits released alongside the song, could vaguely gesture at the themes of the game. IO Interactive has previously said that its game focuses on a young, inexperienced and more reckless Bond, before he developed his trademark cool. The developer is also integrating the stealth mechanics it perfected in Hitman into the upcoming game.

Del Rey's personal gaming experience may begin and end with her hit "Video Games," which was apparently written about a former boyfriend's love of World of Warcraft, but the artist does know how to write a song with Bond in mind. Lana Del Rey shared in 2024 that her song "24" from the album Honeymoon was originally written for 2017's Spectre, one of several songs that were cast aside in favor of Sam Smith's "Writing's on the Wall."

007 First Light is coming to Xbox Series X/S, PlayStation 5 and PC on May 27, 2026. A Nintendo Switch 2 version of the game is now coming out this summer.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/gaming/15-years-after-video-games-lana-del-rey-has-an-actual-video-game-song-221925735.html?src=rss

Dórica Just Proved Good Design Belongs on Your Kitchen Counter

Posted on by

Most of us have at least one object in our home we’ve never actually looked at. The napkin holder. The fruit basket. The candle holder that’s been sitting on the same shelf for three years. We use these things daily, sometimes multiple times, and yet they exist in this strange invisible space between functional and forgotten. That’s exactly the space that Sebastián Ángeles decided to design for.

Ángeles is the founder and creative director of Dórica, a Mexico City-based contemporary furniture brand that has spent years building a quiet but increasingly well-regarded reputation for pieces that prioritize longevity over trend. Their chairs, benches, and credenzas have found their way into residential, commercial, and hospitality spaces, and the brand has been recognized as one of the most relevant contemporary furniture names coming out of Mexico. But with Prea, released in February 2026 and recently featured by Wallpaper, Ángeles shifted his focus somewhere more intimate: the objects you reach for without thinking.

Designer: Sebastián Ángeles for Dórica

Prea is labeled “Chapter II” in Dórica’s story, and the brand describes it as their first collection of everyday objects. It’s a small but considered group of pieces, including an egg basket, a fruit basket, a candelabra, and a napkin holder, each designed and produced in Mexico with a clear emphasis on wood and ceramic, clean lines, and what the brand calls “material honesty.” The pieces are not elaborate. They don’t announce themselves when you walk into a room. And that restraint is, I think, the entire point.

Wallpaper described Prea as “a study in restraint,” and that feels right. But I’d push it further. Prea is actually a philosophical statement wrapped in a very practical object. The brand’s own language around the collection is striking: “Design here does not decorate. It holds. It supports. It allows the ordinary to be seen.” That’s not the kind of copy you expect from a brand selling a napkin holder. It’s the kind of thought that makes you pause.

We talk constantly in design circles about the gap between high design and everyday life, between the gallery object and the kitchen counter. Dórica seems genuinely uninterested in that gap existing at all. The premise of Prea is that the objects living alongside our daily rituals, the things we touch without registering that we’re touching them, deserve the same level of intentionality that goes into a statement chair or a sculptural lamp. Not to make them more important than they are, but to acknowledge that they already are important. We just stopped noticing.

There’s a Mexican design perspective embedded in this that feels worth acknowledging. The brand has always positioned itself around craftsmanship and longevity rather than novelty, and Prea continues that ethos into a new category. It’s a move that says something about how Ángeles sees the role of design in everyday life: not as a luxury layer applied to living, but as something woven into the texture of it.

I’ll be honest, when I first looked at the collection, my instinct was that it seemed minimal to the point of simplicity. A fruit basket is a fruit basket. But the more I sat with the images and the thinking behind the work, the more that restraint started to feel like confidence. These pieces don’t need to perform. They just need to be present, well-made, and honest. In a market saturated with objects begging for your attention, that’s a harder thing to pull off than it looks.

Prea is also a smart move for Dórica as a brand. Entering the everyday objects category at this level of intention signals a maturity that not every furniture brand is willing to commit to. It’s easier to scale up into bigger, more visible pieces. Scaling down into the egg basket, and making it mean something, takes a different kind of confidence. If you’re the kind of person who has ever picked up a beautifully made object and held it for just a second longer than you needed to, this collection is worth seeking out.

The post Dórica Just Proved Good Design Belongs on Your Kitchen Counter first appeared on Yanko Design.

The PBS Artemis II documentary is streaming on YouTube

Posted on by

The crew of NASA's Artemis II mission have safely returned to Earth, but if your Moon fever has yet to break, or you're curious to get a big picture view of how the second of a planned five Moon missions was pulled off, PBS has a new documentary you'll want to watch. The hour-long Return to the Moon was produced for PBS' NOVA and aired on TV on April 15, but you can view the episode in its entirety on YouTube right now.

Return to the Moon covers the history of NASA's Artemis program, and specifically the planning and preparation that went into Artemis II. Per the documentary's official description:

Follow the four members of the Artemis II crew as they embark on a perilous 10-day journey to orbit the Moon, venturing beyond Earth orbit for the first time since Apollo and farther into the Solar System than any humans have gone before. And get an inside look at the preparations needed to overcome the extreme engineering challenges of human-crewed spaceflight, all the way from launch to splashdown.

The last Apollo mission was in 1972, so Artemis II getting a group of four astronauts anywhere near the Moon has naturally generated a lot of excitement. The crew flew further away from Earth than anyone has gone so far, captured some stunning photos of both the Moon and our home planet and managed to make everyone feel better about their dislike of Microsoft Outlook. Few Moon missions have been as well-documented or relatable.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/science/the-pbs-artemis-ii-documentary-is-streaming-on-youtube-210347406.html?src=rss

This iPhone Air 2 Concept Adds Two Cameras and Suddenly the Phone Makes More Sense

Posted on by

Every first-generation Apple product is essentially a beta test with a premium price tag, and the iPhone Air was no exception. The engineering was genuinely remarkable: 5.6mm thin, a large ProMotion display, A19 Pro performance, and battery life that surprised nearly everyone who reviewed it. What wasn’t remarkable were the two omissions that showed up in every single hands-on: one camera and one speaker, on a phone that cost $999. Those two complaints alone handed buyers a perfectly logical reason to spend the same money on a Pro instead. The Air needed a second generation the moment the first one shipped.

Demon’s Tech has imagined exactly what that second generation could look like, and the concept renders suggest Apple already has a clear path to making the Air the phone it should have been from the start. The dual-camera bar is wide and confident across the top of the phone, housing two lenses with room to spare. The rest of the body is pure restraint, a flat back, centered Apple logo, and a color range vivid enough to give the phone a personality that its specs can now actually back up. If the rumored stereo speaker and efficiency-focused N2 chip join that camera upgrade, the Air 2 goes from interesting to genuinely compelling.

Designer: Demon’s Tech

Two 48-megapixel sensors reportedly sit inside the pill-shaped housing, one primary and one ultrawide, which aligns with leaks from Chinese tipster Digital Chat Station suggesting Apple is going for a main-plus-ultrawide configuration rather than a telephoto. That choice makes sense for the Air’s positioning. Telephoto glass demands physical depth that a sub-6mm chassis simply cannot accommodate, and ultrawide coverage is what most non-Pro users actually miss day-to-day. The original Air’s single-lens bar always looked slightly incomplete, like a sentence that trailed off mid-thought, and Demon’s Tech addresses that by stretching the new pill-shaped housing almost the full width of the phone’s upper third, sitting flush and purposeful rather than apologetic. It is a small change on paper that transforms the entire visual logic of the back panel.

Apple shipped the original Air in four relatively restrained options: cloud white, sky blue, light gold, and matte space black. Demon’s Tech blows that palette wide open, running through violet, cobalt, mint green, and vivid red alongside the sandy gold seen in the hero shots, which is closer to what the iPhone 5C attempted in 2013, a phone that led with color as a statement rather than a courtesy. The Air’s lifestyle positioning actually supports this approach in a way the 5C’s budget framing never quite did. A phone you buy partly because it is extraordinarily thin is a phone you buy to be noticed, and being noticed in muted gold is considerably less fun than being noticed in electric blue. The renders make a quiet argument that Apple’s colorway restraint on the original Air was a missed opportunity, not a deliberate choice.

Twelve gigabytes of RAM paired with the A20 Pro keeps the performance story simple: this is a phone that matches the Pro lineup on silicon even if it concedes on optics. The sleeper upgrade is Apple’s rumored N2 efficiency chip, because getting better battery life out of a body that physically has less room for cells requires exactly this kind of architectural work, the same discipline that let the original Air post competitive endurance numbers despite its dimensions. Add stereo sound from a bottom speaker alongside the existing top one, and the two most common complaints about the first Air evaporate inside a single product cycle. That is a more focused corrective than Apple managed with either the Mini or the Plus, both of which spent multiple generations struggling to justify their existence. If Apple lands all of this at the same $999 price point, the value math finally starts working in the Air’s favor.

Apple has confirmed the Air line continues, with the second generation reportedly targeting a spring 2027 release window, landing after the iPhone 18 Pro, Pro Max, and foldable models ship in fall 2026. That later window gives Apple’s engineering teams more time to solve the thermal and battery challenges that come with building capable hardware into an impossibly thin frame, and it gives the Air its own launch moment rather than forcing it to compete for attention against a foldable iPhone. Demon’s Tech’s concept is the best visual argument yet for what that launch moment could look like: a phone that carries its thinness as a given rather than an excuse, and finally has the camera system and audio to back up everything the form factor promises.

The post This iPhone Air 2 Concept Adds Two Cameras and Suddenly the Phone Makes More Sense first appeared on Yanko Design.

A lot of you panic-bought PCs to avoid RAMaggedon 2026

Posted on by

The specter of price hikes caused by the current AI-driven demand for memory and storage appears to have convinced a fair share of people to buy a new computer. According to data analyzed by Counterpoint Research, global PC shipments grew around 3.2 percent year-over-year in Q1 2026, "driven by pre-emptive buying before memory-led price increases hit the retail level" and Microsoft forcing some customers to upgrade by ending support for Windows 10 last year.

Sales hit 63.3 million units during the first quarter, Counterpoint says, and were particularly concentrated in five high-end PC makers: Lenovo, ASUS, Apple, HP and Dell. Of the five, Lenovo commands the most PC market share at 26 percent, but sales increased for almost all of the companies, save for HP, whose year-over-year sales technically declined by 5 percent. Of particular note, Apple's PC sales grew by 11 percent, likely on the strength of the M5 updates it made to the MacBook Pro and MacBook Air, and the introduction of the affordable $600 MacBook Neo. Counterpoint suggests the updates could drive even further sales growth next quarter. 

Even with positive sales, the PC industry as a whole is by no means out of the woods. "The aggressive expansion in AI infrastructure investment is driving up overall component costs, which will likely impact the pricing of CPUs and other key components in [PCs]," Counterpoint Senior Analyst Minsoo Kang says. "Ultimately, the sustained upward pressure on costs and the resulting hike in retail prices are expected to have a significant negative impact on the PC market’s growth in 2026."

A general sense that the worst is yet to come is consistent with what other analysts have warned about the current shortages of RAM and storage. In December 2025, IDC predicted that PC shipments could drop as much as 8.9 percent in 2026 in response to the price of RAM, and later revised its prediction to 11.6 percent this past March. Even if consumers aren't feeling the worst of these price hikes just yet, new announcements of price increases seem to arrive like clockwork every few weeks — for example, this week, Meta raised the price of its Quest headsets — which means if they aren't feeling them now, they will soon.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/computing/a-lot-of-you-panic-bought-pcs-to-avoid-ramaggedon-2026-200237204.html?src=rss

This 2026 Lamborghini F1 Livery Proves the Raging Bull Belongs on the Grid (Even If It Never Happens)

Posted on by

The 2026 F1 season marks the biggest technical reset the sport has seen in over a decade, with new power unit regulations that push electric deployment even harder and a reshuffled grid that includes Audi’s factory entry and Cadillac arriving as a legitimate constructor. It’s the kind of moment when the paddock genuinely opens up to new possibilities, when manufacturers who’ve been sitting on the sidelines start doing the math on whether an F1 program could actually make sense. Lamborghini will almost certainly remain on those sidelines, because spending nine figures annually to race in a series where your parent company already fields a team (Audi, also owned by Volkswagen Group) would be corporate redundancy at its most wasteful. But that didn’t stop designer Daniel Rodriguez from asking what a Lamborghini livery would look like if Sant’Agata Bolognese decided to crash the party anyway. If it did, it would be the third bull-based team on the track after Red Bull and Racing Bulls!

Rodriguez’s concept wraps a 2026-spec F1 car in Arancio Borealis and gloss black with a geometric lattice pattern that pulls directly from Lamborghini’s current design vocabulary. The hexagonal graphics echo the Revuelto’s taillight treatment and the angular obsession that defines the brand’s styling language, flowing from dense at the cockpit to sparse at the rear wing. Italian flag accents trace the halo and nose cone, sponsor logos for Macron and Eni add commercial credibility, and the raging bull emblem sits on the rear wing endplates where it would photograph beautifully in the pit lane even if TV cameras never caught it. The renders are good enough to pass for official press shots, lit with the kind of moody amber-to-black gradients that Lamborghini’s own marketing team would approve.

Designer: Daniel Rodriguez

What makes this livery work is that Rodriguez doesn’t try to make the F1 car look like a Lamborghini road car, because that’s impossible and also beside the point. An F1 car is a regulatory sculpture shaped by wind tunnel data and the FIA’s technical rulebook, and no amount of vinyl wrap changes that fundamental reality. Instead, the livery translates Lamborghini’s graphic and color vocabulary into a form factor that has nothing to do with mid-engine supercars, and it does so in a way that feels both authentic to the brand and appropriate for the paddock. The Arancio Borealis orange sits somewhere between molten lava and a traffic cone, instantly recognizable as Lamborghini without requiring the car to sprout scissor doors or a V12 exhaust note. The gloss black creates genuine visual tension rather than just contrast, breaking up the body in a way that emphasizes the car’s aerodynamic surfaces instead of fighting them.

The hexagonal lattice pattern running down the sidepods and over the engine cover is the detail that sells the whole concept. Lamborghini has been obsessed with hexagons since the Aventador introduced them as a recurring motif back in 2011, and they’ve since migrated to every surface the brand touches. Taillights, grilles, interior stitching, wheel designs, all of it hexagons. Rodriguez takes that obsession and applies it to the F1 car’s sidepods in a way that creates visual density without cluttering the canvas. The pattern starts tight and geometric at the front, creating a sense of structural integrity, then gradually opens up as it flows rearward, giving the eye a path to follow from cockpit to diffuser. It’s a graphic solution that respects both the brand’s identity and the car’s aerodynamic purpose.

The Italian tricolor is handled with restraint, running as a thin accent stripe that outlines the halo and reappears on the nose cone. It’s subtle enough to avoid looking like a generic tribute to the brand’s Sant’Agata Bolognese heritage, but prominent enough that the car reads as distinctly Italian when parked next to Ferrari’s red. The sponsor integration is equally thoughtful. Macron, the Italian sportswear brand that already kits out Bologna FC and the Italian national rugby team, appears on the sidepods and rear wing. Eni, the Italian energy giant with deep motorsport ties, gets placement on the engine cover. Both partnerships feel plausible rather than fantastical, the kind of commercial relationships Lamborghini could actually secure if they showed up to the grid tomorrow.

Even the mandated wheel covers, which the 2026 regulations require for aerodynamic efficiency and which most teams treat as blank canvases or necessary evils, get the hexagon treatment here. It’s a small detail that maintains visual consistency across every surface, ensuring the car reads as a cohesive design rather than a collection of sponsor panels held together by regulations. The raging bull emblem on the rear wing endplates is rendered in white against black, a detail that would be nearly invisible during race broadcasts but would photograph beautifully in static pit lane shots and pre-race media coverage.

Will Lamborghini actually enter F1 in 2026 or beyond? Almost certainly not. The economics don’t justify it, the brand’s identity doesn’t need F1 validation, and their motorsport budget is better spent on GT3 programs that connect directly to road car sales. But Rodriguez’s concept does something more valuable than predicting the future. It proves that Lamborghini’s design language is strong enough to survive translation into a form factor it was never intended for, and it shows what the 2026 grid would look like with a raging bull parked next to the prancing horse.

The post This 2026 Lamborghini F1 Livery Proves the Raging Bull Belongs on the Grid (Even If It Never Happens) first appeared on Yanko Design.

Sam Altman’s ‘human verification’ company thinks its eye-scanning orbs could solve ticket scalping

Posted on by

Sam Altman's cryptocurrency turned identity verification startup Tools for Humanity is offering a new set of perks to people who scan their eyes at one of the company's orbs. Among them, is a new tool called Concert Kit that could help bands and artists fight back against ticket scalping bots. 

The new feature relies on the revamped World ID, the orb-based verification system that scans users eyeballs and faces to create a "proof of human" signature that lives on users' mobile devices. "It's basically like a little human passport for the internet that lets you prove on apps and websites that you are a real and unique human without revealing anything about yourself," Tools for Humanity Chief Product Officer Tiago Sada tells Engadget. 

Now, as more apps and services are starting to support World ID, that "human passport" can unlock some new abilities. Coupled with Concert Kit, it allows artists to designate a specific pool of tickets for "verified" humans only. The concept is a bit like how pre-sales currently work, with artists (or their teams) setting aside a specific number of tickets for people who have set up a World ID. Those folks can then use their World ID to get ticket codes for Ticketmaster, Eventbrite, AXS or other major ticketing platforms. 

Because World ID is limited to actual, "verified," humans the system won't be susceptible to the same tactics that have enabled bots to ruin the ticket-buying process for so many, Tools for Humanity says. Artists are also in control of what level of verification they want to require from their fans. (The new World ID app will also allow people to set up an account with a selfie check if they don't have ready access to an orb.) 

Just how much of a dent Concert Kit will be able to make in the massive scalping bot problem that plagues the concert industry is less clear. So far, Bruno Mars is slated to use the solution on his upcoming world tour — no word on just how many of his tickets will be reserved for World ID-verified humans, though — and Concert Kit is available to other artists starting today.

Concert Kit is one of several new integrations and updates to World ID that Tools for Humanity announced at an event in San Francisco Friday. Tinder, which earlier this year started testing World ID as an age verification solution in Japan, will be rolling out support worldwide. In the US, Tinder's integration won't be for age verification, though. Instead, it will indicate whether there is an actual "verified" human behind a given profile.

Tinder profiles that verify with World ID will get a badge as an extra signal of authenticity.
Tinder profiles that verify with World ID will get a badge as an extra signal of authenticity.
Tools for Humanity

On the enterprise side, Zoom and DocuSign are also adding support for World ID to help businesses verify that there is an actual person (and not a deepfake or bot) joining their video calls or signing important documents. Tools for Humanity is also introducing a standalone app for World ID that separates its identity verification tools from its existing crypto wallet app.

The updates are Tools for Humanity's latest attempt to make their orb-based verification system, which has been widely mocked, more mainstream and perhaps a little less dystopian. (Elsewhere, orbs have begun appearing in some new places like a San Francisco Gap.) 

On their part, Tools for Humanity seems aware that a lot of people aren't ready to scan their faces at a bunch of orbs controlled by Altman just to "prove" they are humans. I asked Sada, Tools for Humanity's Chief Product Officer, what he would say to people who think that the company is solving for the wrong problem: that really it should be up to ticketing platforms and dating apps and other services to strengthen their security and bot-fighting tools, rather than rely on their users to "prove" their humanness. 

He said it was a "completely understandable question" and compared it to some people's initial discomfort with things like Apple's TouchID or FaceID. "Not everyone has to do it upfront, and that's important," he said. "It's optional. If you want to have a World ID, you get access to that enhanced experience."

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/sam-altmans-human-verification-company-thinks-its-eye-scanning-orbs-could-solve-ticket-scalping-171500555.html?src=rss